Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

Reverend Robert James Roberts Journal 1890 (A/E/R54/R54.1 1890)

00690.jpg

Revision as of Apr 24, 2016, 4:49:38 PM
edited by 172.16.2.144
Revision as of Nov 2, 2016, 1:12:07 PM
edited by 172.16.1.125
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
1
 +
[?] we are duly in receipt of your letter
 +
[?]ago[?] of good is duly read
 +
[?] [?] of [?] is duly [?]
 +
[? ]for their alone
 +
[?] as it is evident
 +
[?] me beg to acknowledge the week of of letter of
 +
yesterday's date
 +
[?] In reply  to your letter of yesterday's date
 +
[?] we shall be glad to receive your reply
 +
[?].
 +
[?] in the course of a few days
 +
[?] we are in need of [?] of yesterdays
 +
date
 +
[?] it is evident
 +
[?] [?] contents of we who have duly noted
 +
[?] there's no necessity
 +
[?] who have had the
 +
[?] so there are
 +
[?] with much pleasure
 +
[?] to be left til called for

Revision as of Nov 2, 2016, 1:12:07 PM

1 [?] we are duly in receipt of your letter [?]ago[?] of good is duly read [?] [?] of [?] is duly [?] [? ]for their alone [?] as it is evident [?] me beg to acknowledge the week of of letter of yesterday's date [?] In reply to your letter of yesterday's date [?] we shall be glad to receive your reply [?]. [?] in the course of a few days [?] we are in need of [?] of yesterdays

date

[?] it is evident [?] [?] contents of we who have duly noted [?] there's no necessity [?] who have had the [?] so there are [?] with much pleasure [?] to be left til called for