Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1914/195 Rex vs. Lem How – attempted murder

GR-0419.193.1914-195p010.jpg

Revision as of Nov 15, 2016, 11:59:37 AM
edited by Rbcm.admin
Revision as of Nov 15, 2016, 11:59:38 AM
protected by Rbcm.admin

Revision as of Nov 15, 2016, 11:59:38 AM

8

57. Q. Was he knocked down before you got there or after? A. Before I got there, oh it must have been after I got there. There was just a row when I got there, the fight was with sticks as I got there.

8. Q. It must have been after you got there that he was knocked down? A. Yes.

9. Q. So that you kept your position in front of 556 ½? A. Yes . 60. Q. And that was your position when you caught the man with the axe? A. Yes.

1. Q. He had come front the North? A. Yes.

2. Q. You saw him meeting you, you were looking towards him? A. Yes.

3. Q. And he had come from the North? A. Yes.

4. Q. So that it wasn’t any man that came from 556 ½? A. No, not just then, he didn’t come down then, no not at that time.

5. Q. And if the accused had come down from 556 1/2. The restaurant there and gone North then it wasn’t the accused that had the axe? A.

MR. RUSSELL: That is argumentative. It is not a proper question. COURT: What is that again?

MR. COWAN: The witness has said that the man that had the axe came from the North towards him.

COURT: Is that right witness? A. Yes.

MR. COWAN: And that he did not come from this restaurant 556 ½ COURT: Is that correct? A. Yes.

MR. COWAN: So that my next question is: could it be, if the accused came down this stairway of 556 ½ could it be him that had the axe. could it? A. No, not if he came down.

MR. RUSSELL: That man could have come down from 556 ½ a few moments before, gone along the came back again South and met this man.

WITNESS: I didn’t see him come down there at all. I didn’t see him come from 556 ½. I saw him go up there, but I didn’t.

BC Archives GR-0419 Box 193 File 1914/195 / BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. / Attorney General documents.