1904-10 Rex vs. Wong On and Wong Gow – murder (at the Chinese theatre)
GR-0419.100.1904-10p030.jpg
Revision as of Dec 13, 2016, 10:44:17 AM edited by Rbcm.admin |
Revision as of Dec 13, 2016, 10:44:32 AM protected by Rbcm.admin |
---|
Revision as of Dec 13, 2016, 10:44:32 AM
23:
into a persecutor for pecuniary purposes.
Mr. Powell: Did -
Court: That question is withdrawn, and if it is on the notes it can be struck off -
Q After they went in to Quann's room that night these four or five fellows, did anyone come in?
Mr. Taylor: I object to that. It is also a leading question - Did anyone come in. My learned friend must have some fairness about this, at least he must be guided by the ordinary principles of law.
Mr. Powell: Is Your Honor going to stand this I merely asked him the question Did anyone come in?
Mr. Taylor: It is a leading question.
Mr. Powell: I would like to have a ruling on that, before we have a long speech.
Mr. Taylor: My learned friend is entitled to ask him what occurred, but not to lead this witness along piecemeal. He is asking a leading question and I submit that my learned friend is not entitled to nurse this witness over the tender spots; he is entitled to ask him where he was on that evening, and what occurred, but he is not entitled to ask him a leading question such as this -
Mr. Powell: Would your Honor give a ruling on that. I asked him if anyone came in after they were there?
Mr. Taylor: That is leading.
Mr. Powell: We have heard your objection; surely, the court is entitled to give an opinion on it.
Court: I do not think it is every question that requires yes or no for an answer that is a leading question. I do not think there is anything
BC Archives GR-0419 Box 100 File 1904/10 / BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. / Attorney General documents.