1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878
GR-0419.17.1878-26p055.jpg
| Revision as of May 6, 2024, 4:45:11 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
Revision as of May 6, 2024, 6:59:32 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | under those ?otherwise if a tax collector were ? in consequential | + | under those [?] otherwise if a tax collector were [?] in consequential |
a similar endorsement on the writ | a similar endorsement on the writ | ||
to wait till the party suing him | to wait till the party suing him | ||
| − | applied his infirmetion? the collection of any | + | applied his [infirmetion?] the collection of any |
tax no matter how legal or constitutional | tax no matter how legal or constitutional | ||
| − | might he delayed for ? e.q. | + | might he delayed for [?] e.q. |
if the seizure were made and the writ | if the seizure were made and the writ | ||
| − | were issued in the ? | + | were issued in the [?] |
If does not at all follow from the | If does not at all follow from the | ||
fear of a writ being indorsed with notice | fear of a writ being indorsed with notice | ||
| − | Infirmetion? will be applied for | + | [Infirmetion?] will be applied for |
| − | The claim for the Infirmetion? indorsed on | + | The claim for the [Infirmetion?] indorsed on |
| − | the writ is merely a preliminary for mality | + | the writ is merely a preliminary for [mality?- |
| − | if ? he pleaded to yeven? supposing | + | if [?] he pleaded to [yeven?] supposing |
| − | ? by defendant for the writ | + | [?] by defendant for the writ |
| − | if ? he inferred? exception by | + | if [?] he inferred? exception by |
| − | applying to the Court by ? on | + | applying to the Court by [?] on |
| − | affidavit ? could he | + | affidavit [?] could he |
| − | stated shy the writ should not ? | + | stated shy the writ should not [?] |
| − | The order ? the ? made the | + | The order [?] the [?] made the |
| − | ? is a ? order | + | [?] is a [?] order |
| − | ? notice of such an order will | + | [?] notice of such an order will |
| − | ? suffice the affidavit ? | + | [?] suffice the affidavit [?] |
| − | sider? show that the order was demanded | + | [sider? ]show that the order was demanded |
But suppose such a notice was sufficient | But suppose such a notice was sufficient | ||
Revision as of May 6, 2024, 6:59:32 AM
under those [?] otherwise if a tax collector were [?] in consequential a similar endorsement on the writ to wait till the party suing him applied his [infirmetion?] the collection of any
tax no matter how legal or constitutional
might he delayed for [?] e.q. if the seizure were made and the writ were issued in the [?]
If does not at all follow from the fear of a writ being indorsed with notice [Infirmetion?] will be applied for
The claim for the [Infirmetion?] indorsed on
the writ is merely a preliminary for [mality?-
if [?] he pleaded to [yeven?] supposing [?] by defendant for the writ if [?] he inferred? exception by applying to the Court by [?] on affidavit [?] could he stated shy the writ should not [?]
The order [?] the [?] made the [?] is a [?] order [?] notice of such an order will [?] suffice the affidavit [?]
[sider? ]show that the order was demanded
But suppose such a notice was sufficient service of the order there is nothing on the affidavit filed for the Plaintiff to show that after the service of the notice any of the Plaintiff's goods were sold or the proceed thereof parted with
Nor that the defendant either after serving the notice or being served with the order willfully or intentionally