Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878

GR-0419.17.1878-26p050.jpg

Revision as of Aug 14, 2020, 9:00:47 AM
created by 172.16.1.125		 Revision as of Aug 14, 2020, 9:07:33 AM
edited by 172.16.1.125
Line 1: Line 1:
−
                            But suppose such a notice was
+
            But suppose such a notice was
−
                            sufficient service of the order there
+
            sufficient service of the order there
−
                            is nothing in the affidavit of the
+
            is nothing in the affidavit of the
−
                            Plaintiff to show that after the
+
            Plaintiff to show that after the
−
                            service of the notice any of the  
+
            service of the notice any of the  
−
                            <u>Plaintiffs</u> food were sold or the
+
            <u>Plaintiffs</u> food were sold or the
−
                            proceeds thereof parted.
+
              proceeds thereof parted.
−
                            [?]  that the Defendant [?] after receiving
+
              [?]  that the Defendant [?] after receiving
−
                            the notice or being served with
+
              the notice or being served with
−
 
+
              the order willfully & intentionally
 +
              violates the [?] of the order  [?]
 +
              the contrary the [Debt?] affidavit
 +
            shows that the Oppressed a desire [?]
 +
            [Kach?] [ni?] obedience to
 +
            legal authority
  
  

Revision as of Aug 14, 2020, 9:07:33 AM

            But suppose such a notice was
            sufficient service of the order there
            is nothing in the affidavit of the
            Plaintiff to show that after the
            service of the notice any of the 
            Plaintiffs food were sold or the
             proceeds thereof parted.
             [?]  that the Defendant [?] after receiving
             the notice or being served with
             the order willfully & intentionally
             violates the [?] of the order  [?]
             the contrary the [Debt?] affidavit
            shows that the Oppressed a desire [?]
            [Kach?] [ni?] obedience to
            legal authority


BC Archives GR-0419 BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERALS. Box 17 File 1878/26 Attorney General documents