1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878
GR-0419.17.1878-26p047.jpg
| Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:25:38 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:30:44 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff | that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff | ||
| − | Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have | + | Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice, |
Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order | Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order | ||
Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers | Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers | ||
After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | ||
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:30:44 AM
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice, Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff