1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878
GR-0419.17.1878-26p047.jpg
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:25:22 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:25:38 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? | + | that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff |
Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have ? late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice, | Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have ? late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice, | ||
Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order | Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order | ||
Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers | Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers | ||
After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff |
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:25:38 AM
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have ? late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice, Than about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order Than after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff