Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878

GR-0419.17.1878-26p045.jpg

Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:05:10 AM
created by 172.20.1.1
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:05:26 AM
edited by 172.20.1.1
Line 1: Line 1:
Plaintiff nor any other of the persons where goods were suized were notified that the sale ? take place on the 25 ? the contraty the Defh? ported ar ? 18 notice in ? ?
+
persons where goods were suized were notified that the sale ? take place on the 25 ? the contraty the Defh? ported ar ? 18 notice in ? ?
 
that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these ? being ? up on the same street ? a few yards of the? of both Palaintill & the ? Chong
 
that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these ? being ? up on the same street ? a few yards of the? of both Palaintill & the ? Chong
 
The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by ? on the 19th Sept ? ? with a ? ? (? 15 the ? 1954) with noice that on ? had he applied for 15 ? [deft?] from selling
 
The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by ? on the 19th Sept ? ? with a ? ? (? 15 the ? 1954) with noice that on ? had he applied for 15 ? [deft?] from selling
 
On the 23rd Sept the ? the Plaintiff earned and applied for ?
 
On the 23rd Sept the ? the Plaintiff earned and applied for ?
 
The Paintill ? was
 
The Paintill ? was

Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 10:05:26 AM

persons where goods were suized were notified that the sale ? take place on the 25 ? the contraty the Defh? ported ar ? 18 notice in ? ? that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these ? being ? up on the same street ? a few yards of the? of both Palaintill & the ? Chong The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by ? on the 19th Sept ? ? with a ? ? (? 15 the ? 1954) with noice that on ? had he applied for 15 ? [deft?] from selling On the 23rd Sept the ? the Plaintiff earned and applied for ? The Paintill ? was