Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878

GR-0419.17.1878-26p044.jpg

Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 9:53:29 AM
edited by 172.20.1.1
Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 9:54:55 AM
edited by 172.20.1.1
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
/
 
/
After seizure he [noticed?] one of the persons (? chong) where goods had been seizured that his (? Chongs) goods [had?] he sold on the 25 Sept but ? ? from the ? 5 days was the time ? for holding goods under ? warrant he went to the party ? that he had made a mistake that Cho ? take p0lace on the 23th instead of the 25 return a ? of the notice ?
+
After seizure he notified one of the persons (? chong) where goods had been seizured that his (? Chongs) goods [had?] he sold on the 25 Sept but ? ? from the ? 5 days was the time ? for holding goods under ? warrant he went to the party ? that he had made a mistake that Cho ? take p0lace on the 23th instead of the 25 return a ? of the notice ?
 
Plaintiff nor any other of the
 
Plaintiff nor any other of the

Revision as of Apr 25, 2024, 9:54:55 AM

Tan Chong

Maguire Brief for Counsel to ? for attachment.

/ After seizure he notified one of the persons (? chong) where goods had been seizured that his (? Chongs) goods [had?] he sold on the 25 Sept but ? ? from the ? 5 days was the time ? for holding goods under ? warrant he went to the party ? that he had made a mistake that Cho ? take p0lace on the 23th instead of the 25 return a ? of the notice ? Plaintiff nor any other of the