Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878

GR-0419.17.1878-26p010.jpg

Revision as of Jul 17, 2020, 11:20:18 AM
edited by 172.16.1.125
Revision as of Jul 17, 2020, 12:50:50 PM
edited by 172.16.1.125
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The fourteenth day of November A.D. 1878
 
The fourteenth day of November A.D. 1878
  
The Plaintiff <person's name> <unknown> Robert Edison(?) <unknown> his Attourney sues the defendant John Maguire for <unknown> the defendant converted to his own use and wrongfully deprived the Plaintiff of the use and possession of the Plaintiff's goods that is to say two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel and the Plaintiff further sues the defendant for that the defendant broke and entered the dwelling house belonging to the Plaintiff and continued and stayed therein for the space of one day making great noise and disturbance therein and greatly disturbed and disquieted the Plaintiff in the possession and the employment of the said dwelling house and then also with force and <something> took and <something> goods and chattels to wit two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel thew being in the said dwelling house and in <something> part thereof <something> used as a shop by the Plaintiff in his trade and <something> of a merchant and which said goods and chattels thew were part of the stock in trade of the Plaintiff in the way of his trade and business and of great value to <something> five hundred dollars and <something> and disposed thereof to his <something> use to <something> a false and unfounded claim that the defendant <something> have entitled to seize and take possession of the said goods to enforce payment of a certain license to be due from the Plaintiff to Her Majesty by virtue of the Chinese Tax Act 1878 by means whereof and of the premises the Plaintiff was greatly annoyed prejudiced <something> and disturbed <something>
+
The Plaintiff <person's name> by Robert Edwin Jackson his Attourney sues the defendant John Maguire for that the defendant converted to his own use and wrongfully deprived the Plaintiff of the use and possession of the Plaintiff's goods that is to say two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel and the Plaintiff further sues the defendant for that the defendant broke and entered the dwelling house belonging to the Plaintiff and continued and stayed therein for the space of one day making great noise and disturbance therein and greatly disturbed and disquieted the Plaintiff in the possession and the enjoyment of the said dwelling house and then also with force and arms took and seized divers goods and chattels to wit two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel thew being in the said dwelling house and in certain part thereof thew used as a shop by the Plaintiff in his trade and business of a merchant and which said goods and chattels thew were part of the stock in trade of the Plaintiff in the way of his trade and business and of great value to wit five hundred dollars and converted and disposed thereof to his own use to wit a false and unfounded claim that the defendant was then entitled to seize and take possession of the said goods to enforce payment of a certain license to be due from the Plaintiff to Her Majesty by virtue of the Chinese Tax Act 1878 by means whereof and of the premises the Plaintiff was greatly annoyed prejudiced suffered and disturbed in carrying

Revision as of Jul 17, 2020, 12:50:50 PM

To the Supreme Court of British Columbia

The fourteenth day of November A.D. 1878

The Plaintiff <person's name> by Robert Edwin Jackson his Attourney sues the defendant John Maguire for that the defendant converted to his own use and wrongfully deprived the Plaintiff of the use and possession of the Plaintiff's goods that is to say two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel and the Plaintiff further sues the defendant for that the defendant broke and entered the dwelling house belonging to the Plaintiff and continued and stayed therein for the space of one day making great noise and disturbance therein and greatly disturbed and disquieted the Plaintiff in the possession and the enjoyment of the said dwelling house and then also with force and arms took and seized divers goods and chattels to wit two pieces of cloth and one piece of flannel thew being in the said dwelling house and in certain part thereof thew used as a shop by the Plaintiff in his trade and business of a merchant and which said goods and chattels thew were part of the stock in trade of the Plaintiff in the way of his trade and business and of great value to wit five hundred dollars and converted and disposed thereof to his own use to wit a false and unfounded claim that the defendant was then entitled to seize and take possession of the said goods to enforce payment of a certain license to be due from the Plaintiff to Her Majesty by virtue of the Chinese Tax Act 1878 by means whereof and of the premises the Plaintiff was greatly annoyed prejudiced suffered and disturbed in carrying