Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

Chung Chi

GR-0431.6.3.6p007.jpg

Revision as of Mar 21, 2020, 11:45:50 AM
created by 172.16.1.125
Revision as of Mar 4, 2022, 9:36:38 AM
replaced by 172.20.1.1
Line 1: Line 1:
9
+
e
 
+
Q: Were pit lamps used in any other portion of the mine?
+
A: In No. 4 Incline, naked lights were used.
+
Q: What was the condition of the mine the day of the explosion, wet or dry?
+
A: It was wet around that section.
+
Mr. Pooley:- Are both those lamps "A" and "C" locked? or were locked when found?
+
A: They were both locked when found.
+
Q: Was that hole in the roof that was referred to by Mr. Potts, there before or after the explosion? Was that big hole there before or after the explosion?
+
A: Well, the one that he mentioned about the gas being in, and reported in the report book, was there before the explosion.
+
Q: How big a hole was that?
+
A: Probably about four feet wide and may be two and a half to 3 feet high.
+
Q: In a dangerous place?
+
A: No.
+
Q: The roof after the explosion was about 25 feet high?
+
A: Yes, but not in the same place.
+
Mr. Hall:- Were those 7 Chinese burnt sometime ago, burnt on this same level?
+
A: What do you mean about "some time ago"?
+
Q: About six months ago?
+
A: I couldn't tell.
+
Mr. Matthews:- The were burnt on the north side.
+
Mr. Hall:- Are you altogether sure that that hole was four feet wide?
+
A: It is there to-day to be seen, and it is no higher now than it was the.
+
Q: Don't you think the crack extended quite a distance above that?
+
A: That I couldn't tell.
+
Q: You could see it was larger?
+
A: I couldn't say. If that cave was broke further up or not, it is a very shaly roof, and the slips may be in this direction.
+
Q: It might be larger and you not know it?
+
A: Yes.
+
Q: About this exhibit "A". I think you said something like this, that that lamp in your opinion would have caused the explosion if there had been a volume of gas there?
+
A: I said if the glass of that lamp had been broken before the accumulation of gas took place, then in my opinion that would have caused the explosion. I don't think it did cause it, although there was that likelihood that it would.
+
Q: You don't say that that lamp did cause the explosion?
+
A: I don't, but it might have done it.
+
Q: How do you account for this Exhibit "A" being separated from the other part of the lamp?
+
A: When we found that lamp first of all the other part if the lamp was there beside it.  To-day it is not there, and where it is I can't tell you.
+
Q: Would the man who had these lamps in charge give us any information with regard to that lamp, whether it went into the mine separately or apart?
+
A: It never went down the mine like that; that's a certainty.
+
By a Juror:- What is the usual procedure when gas is reported in a mine, the same as it is in that book?
+
A: The usual procedure is, if the men are working with naked lights, they are given safety lamps. The fireman, when there is gas in a place where a man is working, doesn't fire any shots in that place, but tells the man to get out the coal with a pick. There has been times since I came on when shooting has been stopped and the men allowed extra yardage for taking the coal out with pick and wedge.
+
Q: Is it contrary to the Act to have a naked light in the traveling way?
+
A: No, I don't think so.
+
Q: Is it customary for the Chinamen to take matches in there?
+
A: The law says they should not.
+
 
+
BC Archives GR-0431 Box 6 File 3
+
 
+
BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Inquisitions/inquests conducted by coroners in British Columbia.
+

Revision as of Mar 4, 2022, 9:36:38 AM

e