Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MTE"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others | that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others | ||
| − | That the notice was read aloud to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come too late | + | That the notice was read aloud to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come too late where's the order" he proceeded with the sale that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (enumerated) after service of the notice, |
That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order | That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order | ||
That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. | That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. | ||
After the application for attachment for ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | After the application for attachment for ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | ||
Revision as of 01:39, 6 May 2024
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others That the notice was read aloud to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come too late where's the order" he proceeded with the sale that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (enumerated) after service of the notice, That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. After the application for attachment for ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff
