21

Q: Did you see the bodies fax of the Chinamen taken out?

A: Yes. I found the body first. It was burnt all over the exposed, the fleshy parts.

Q: That was the last one taken out?

A: The last I think his name was Mah Lee. I examined him carefully while the undertaker was putting him in the box.

Q: That would indicate the explosion occurred before the cave in?

A: I don’t think so.

Q: Would the Chinaman be burnt if the cave in came first?

A: It might that the explosion and the cave in was simultaneous.

Q: Were you present when the lamp was found at -------?

A: I found the last Chinaman’s lamp “C” ?

Q: In examining the lamp is there anything which would indicate that that was the cause of the explosion?

A: I dismantled that lamp to-day and tested it with my own breath, as it were; but I don’t think that it is a sufficient test. I think if there was a high velocity of air and pressure you could have blown that lamp out. In other words, there is a probability that that lamp would ha e case flame. Had it been properly tested in the damaged and defective statein which we found it, you might have found that that lamp passed flame.

Q: Do you mean to say that the lamp was defective?

A: No, I am speaking of to-day; if a proper test had been made.

Q: Was it locked?

A: Yes.

Q: Locked when you found it?

A: Yes.

Q: Did you find any explosive substance other than gas?

A: Fuse principally.

Q: No dynamite?

A: I didn’t see any dynamite.

Q: Power of any sort?

Q: No.

Q: Other than the matches you found on this Chinaman’s coat, did you find anything else?

A: There were fond whenthe Chinaman’s friend came down to get his watch.

Q: Who was that Chinaman?

A: I don’t know. Some friend of the deceased, I think.

By Mr.:Pooley:- You say that you found this lamp B on the roadway of No.5?

A: Yes, sir.

Q: What is your opinion-------had that anything to do with the explosion.

A: NO, I don’t think so, because the evidences of force were towards that lamp, not from it.

Q: Was this a wet or a dry mine?

A: A wet mine.

Q: How as the ventilation of the mine?

A: Perfectly adequate when I saw it tested by Mr. Morgan on the 16th. He then got 15000 cubic feet, being 4000 to 5000 cubic feet per man.

By a Juror:- How do you account for that lamp B being in that condition?

A: It was simply been opened, detached from the upper portion for the purpose of lighting cigarettes probably.

Q: How could it be detached if it had been locked?

A: It had been tampered with and opened. Men frequently open these lamps.

Q: Could any person open them?

A: They can open them with an American clock key, nails and pieces of wood made for the purpose. Men often open them without any business for doing so.

Q: They could hardly be safety lamps then?

A: They are safe until that are tampered with.

Q: Your opinion is that some Chinaman opened that lamp for the purpose of lighting a cigarette?

A: Not this extra lamp because there were the usual number of lamps at the face for the workers there. This extra lamp was lying there for how long I couldn’t tell, but it had evidently been placed theref or the purpose of making a light.

BC Archives GR-0431 Box 6 File 3 BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Inquisitions/inquests conducted by coroners in British Columbia.