1904-10 Rex vs. Wong On and Wong Gow – murder (at the Chinese theatre)
GR-0419.100.1904-10p032.jpg
| Revision as of Dec 12, 2016, 2:48:41 PM created by 172.16.1.125 |
Revision as of Dec 13, 2016, 10:55:56 AM edited by Rbcm.admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | 25: | ||
| + | Mr. Taylor: I am entitled to have the answer as it was said. What did he say to your question? | ||
| − | + | Interpreter: He say No. He says Mann Quann asked him to go up and bring Nam Yuen and get some actors that belonged to the theatre - | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Mr. Powell: We will not go into that. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Mr. Taylor: I object to any statement as to what anyone said. | |
| − | Q | + | |
| − | + | Court: Oh yes. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Q After that episode that he has just told us about, did anyone else come into the room? | |
| − | and my learned friend he asked him the question and | + | |
| − | "No" got his answer, | + | Mr. Taylor: I object to that; he was asked if anyone came in, and he said No. |
| − | that answer, | + | |
| − | BC Archives GR-0419 | + | Mr. Powell: He is telling it in his own style, and he gives one answer which is ahead of the one I am getting at. |
| + | |||
| + | Mr. Taylor: My objection is being put forward at present. My learned friend asked a question did anyone come into the room, and I took an objection on the ground it was a leading question, and your Honor ruled it was a proper question and not his answer and my learned friend he asked him the question and "No" got his answer, and he now wants to cross-examine on | ||
| + | that answer, and now the next question he is asking is did anyone else come into the room. That is a false suggestion, and it is cross-examination on his own question, and he is not entitled to ask this question. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mr. Powell: Of course you will understand my learned friend is trying to suppress this evidence as to what did take place. I asked my witness a question, and then he begins to tell of another incident. Now, I am going to conduct this examination in my own way and I am not going to be stopped. I think | ||
| + | |||
| + | BC Archives GR-0419 Box 100 File 1904/10 / BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. / Attorney General documents. | ||
Revision as of Dec 13, 2016, 10:55:56 AM
25:
Mr. Taylor: I am entitled to have the answer as it was said. What did he say to your question?
Interpreter: He say No. He says Mann Quann asked him to go up and bring Nam Yuen and get some actors that belonged to the theatre -
Mr. Powell: We will not go into that.
Mr. Taylor: I object to any statement as to what anyone said.
Court: Oh yes.
Q After that episode that he has just told us about, did anyone else come into the room?
Mr. Taylor: I object to that; he was asked if anyone came in, and he said No.
Mr. Powell: He is telling it in his own style, and he gives one answer which is ahead of the one I am getting at.
Mr. Taylor: My objection is being put forward at present. My learned friend asked a question did anyone come into the room, and I took an objection on the ground it was a leading question, and your Honor ruled it was a proper question and not his answer and my learned friend he asked him the question and "No" got his answer, and he now wants to cross-examine on that answer, and now the next question he is asking is did anyone else come into the room. That is a false suggestion, and it is cross-examination on his own question, and he is not entitled to ask this question.
Mr. Powell: Of course you will understand my learned friend is trying to suppress this evidence as to what did take place. I asked my witness a question, and then he begins to tell of another incident. Now, I am going to conduct this examination in my own way and I am not going to be stopped. I think
BC Archives GR-0419 Box 100 File 1904/10 / BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. / Attorney General documents.