Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1904-10 Rex vs. Wong On and Wong Gow – murder (at the Chinese theatre)

GR-0419.100.1904-10p016.jpg

Revision as of Dec 8, 2016, 2:45:23 PM
created by 172.16.1.125
Revision as of Dec 8, 2016, 2:46:09 PM
edited by 172.16.1.125
Line 10: Line 10:
 
COURT:      I think it would be better if you would translate it as you  go  along.        I might as well inform the Counsel  that the Interpreter objects to administering this form of oath.        You will have to have another interpreter to  administer the oath.    He objects to  administering it.
 
COURT:      I think it would be better if you would translate it as you  go  along.        I might as well inform the Counsel  that the Interpreter objects to administering this form of oath.        You will have to have another interpreter to  administer the oath.    He objects to  administering it.
 
MR. TAYLOR:      May I ask your Honor why ? Interpreter:        This is not a form of oath that is used in the Courts in China, and never been used In the Courts in the United States,  except in these Courts here.
 
MR. TAYLOR:      May I ask your Honor why ? Interpreter:        This is not a form of oath that is used in the Courts in China, and never been used In the Courts in the United States,  except in these Courts here.
MR. POWELL:      I would suggest your Honor that the Interpreter we have aiding the prosecution, David Lee be asked to swear the witnesses  and administer this oath.      He 10 is the Court Interpreter from Vancouver, and he has high testimonials from there, and I have
+
MR. POWELL:      I would suggest your Honor that the Interpreter we have aiding the prosecution, David Lee be asked to swear the witnesses  and administer this oath.      He is the Court Interpreter from Vancouver, and he has high testimonials from there, and I have
  
 
BC Archives GR-0419        BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Box 100 File 1904/10          Attorney General documents.
 
BC Archives GR-0419        BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Box 100 File 1904/10          Attorney General documents.

Revision as of Dec 8, 2016, 2:46:09 PM


COURT: I do not think it would be any harm for the Interpreter to ask the witness what form of oath is the most binding on him, and then if you want a double oath it might be administered if he chooses another form— I do not think there could be any ham in that. Wing just ask him what form of oath is most binding. MR. POWELL: Tell him the different forms and find out which is the most binding Interpreter: (Yip Wing): He say that swearing by the Chicken oath is the most binding. MR.POWELL: Didn't he say either ? Interpreter: Flrst he say either and then he say the Chicken oath- that most binding. COURT: Have you read that form of oath on that Yellow paper Interpreter: No, not read it all. COURT: I think it would be better if you would translate it as you go along. I might as well inform the Counsel that the Interpreter objects to administering this form of oath. You will have to have another interpreter to administer the oath. He objects to administering it. MR. TAYLOR: May I ask your Honor why ? Interpreter: This is not a form of oath that is used in the Courts in China, and never been used In the Courts in the United States, except in these Courts here. MR. POWELL: I would suggest your Honor that the Interpreter we have aiding the prosecution, David Lee be asked to swear the witnesses and administer this oath. He is the Court Interpreter from Vancouver, and he has high testimonials from there, and I have

BC Archives GR-0419 BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Box 100 File 1904/10 Attorney General documents.