Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

1895/82 Regina vs. Foung Due, alias Mon Kee – perjury (a market gardener, sending money home)

GR-0419.60.1895-82p007.jpg

Revision as of May 4, 2020, 10:31:51 AM
created by 172.16.1.125
Revision as of Mar 4, 2022, 11:41:29 PM
replaced by 172.20.1.1
Line 1: Line 1:
(7)
+
e
 
+
MOCK CHEF, merchant, cor. Government and Cormorant Streets :--
+
 
+
I know defendant, have known him ten years; I recognize the book produced (ex. "C"); I saw it and examined it carefully in my capacity of Secretary at a meeting of the Chinese Benevolent Society in April last; it contains the accounts of a vegetable garden worked by five partners; their names are given in another book produced, exhibit "D;" namely Mon Kee, i. e. Foung Due, Fun Que, Sine Sing, Chin Hong and Fun Quie; (this last not on the books); Foung Due told me at the Society meeting that he was Mon Kee in the book; the pages of exhibit "C" now produced to me were admitted at the Society meeting by Foung Due to have been written by him. (First two pages)
+
 
+
FOUNG DUE, recalled:
+
 
+
I say now that I was a partner in the garden at Fairfield with Chin Hong, Fun Que, Suie Sing, Fun Quie; I kept the books at first; I told a story last week when I said I was not a partner and did not keep books.
+
 
+
Certified correct copy of notes of evidence taken on 3rd and 11th October instant, on the hearing of a case on judgment summons in the small Debts Court of Victoria, in which defendant Foung Due was the judgment debtor.
+
 
+
F. Macrae,
+
 
+
Magistrate.
+

Revision as of Mar 4, 2022, 11:41:29 PM

e