1878/26 Tai Chong et al. vs. Maguire – non-payment of head tax due under Chinese Tax Act of 1878
GR-0419.17.1878-26p047.jpg
| Revision as of May 6, 2024, 1:40:49 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
Revision as of May 6, 2024, 1:41:16 AM edited by 172.20.1.1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. | That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. | ||
| − | After the application for attachment for commit for contempt was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff | + | After the application for attachment for commit for contempt ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff |
Revision as of May 6, 2024, 1:41:16 AM
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others That the notice was read aloud to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come too late where's the order" he proceeded with the sale that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (enumerated) after service of the notice, That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order
That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers.
After the application for attachment for commit for contempt ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff