Difference between revisions of ".MTU5.MTY3NDk"

From transcribe
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with "e")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
+
e
Q. What  part of  the thyroid had been forced into there?
+
 
+
A.  It had all been forced upwards and outwards.
+
 
+
Q. What do you mean by outwards ?
+
 
+
A. This way  (indicating).
+
 
+
Q. In other words  the pressure had apparently been brought from behind it?
+
 
+
A. No; the pressure came from in front of it/
+
 
+
Q. Would it naturally not shove it back instead of forward if you push hard ?
+
 
+
A. If you push there hard enough you would be fully convinced; you push upward; if you press hard enough it's got to come out.
+
 
+
Q.  In other words upwards and outwards.?
+
 
+
A. Yes.
+
 
+
Q. Now a man lying in the position you state the body was in, supposing, following up your theory, a man came up  to throttle him, would'nt the marks be up and down the neck instead of  straight across it ? 
+
 
+
A. You would'nt reach up.
+
 
+
Q. But a man  the way you've last showed us there-it's the way you would naturally do it,  is it not? On one side or the other of  the neck instead of across it ?
+
 
+
A. Yes.
+
 
+
Q. So then in a case of  that kind the scars would'nt be straight across  the neck they would be up and down on it, would they not ?
+
 
+
A. I don't know exactly what you mean, Mr Gillan.
+
 
+
Q. Suppose a man reaches to choke;  we'll  presume  that's  the neck (indicating) he naturally would catch him that way ? 
+
 
+
A. Sure.
+
 
+
Q. Then the marks would be up and down instead of straight across ?
+
 
+
A. They would be one above the other.
+
 
+
BC Archives GR-0419    /    BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERAL. /Box 95 File 1903/18    /      Attorney General documents.
+

Latest revision as of 01:57, 5 March 2022

e