Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MTQ"
From transcribe
(Created page with " But suppose such a notice was sufficient service of the order there is nothing in the af...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | But suppose such a notice was | |
| − | + | sufficient service of the order there | |
| − | + | is nothing in the affidavit of the | |
| − | + | Plaintiff to show that after the | |
| − | + | service of the notice any of the | |
| − | + | <u>Plaintiffs</u> food were sold or the | |
| − | + | proceeds thereof parted. | |
| − | + | [?] that the Defendant [?] after receiving | |
| − | + | the notice or being served with | |
| − | + | the order willfully & intentionally | |
| + | violates the [?] of the order [?] | ||
| + | the contrary the [Debt?] affidavit | ||
| + | shows that the Oppressed a desire [?] | ||
| + | [Kach?] [ni?] obedience to | ||
| + | legal authority | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 14 August 2020
But suppose such a notice was
sufficient service of the order there
is nothing in the affidavit of the
Plaintiff to show that after the
service of the notice any of the
Plaintiffs food were sold or the
proceeds thereof parted.
[?] that the Defendant [?] after receiving
the notice or being served with
the order willfully & intentionally
violates the [?] of the order [?]
the contrary the [Debt?] affidavit
shows that the Oppressed a desire [?]
[Kach?] [ni?] obedience to
legal authority
BC Archives GR-0419 BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERALS. Box 17 File 1878/26 Attorney General documents
