Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MTQ"

Revision as of 10:14, 25 April 2024

            But suppose such a notice was
            sufficient service of the order there
            is nothing in the affidavit of the
            Plaintiff to show that after the
            service of the notice any of the 
            Plaintiffs food were sold or the
             proceeds thereof parted with  
             nor that the Defendant [either?] after receiving
             the notice or being served with
             the order willfully & intentionally
             violates the [?] of the order  [?]
             the contrary the [Debt?] affidavit
            shows that the Oppressed a desire [?]
            [Kach?] [in?] obedience to
            legal authority

BC Archives GR-0419 BRITISH COLUMBIA. ATTORNEY GENERALS. Box 17 File 1878/26 Attorney General documents