Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MTE"

From transcribe
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling ? goods ? selling to the Plaintiff
+
that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others
Than the notice was read along to Deft (defendant) the ? "You have come late whereas the order" ? with the ? that Deft (defendant) sold certain ? (?)after service of the notice,
+
That the notice was read aloud to Deft (deffendant) the ? "You have ? late wheras the order" he proceeded with the sale that Deft (deffendant) sold certain ? (enumerated) after service of the notice,
Than  about 10 minutes to ? the Deft (defendant) was served with the order
+
That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order
Than  after such service the Deft (defendant) served ? ? for goods which had been (previously?) sold also for goods sold  ? to the notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers
+
That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers.
After the ? for ? a ? of ? was served on Deft (defendant? the 28nd of Sept ? the order ? selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff
+
After the application for attachment for ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff

Revision as of 10:40, 25 April 2024

that at the time of serving the notice Deft was selling sundy goods restrained belonging to the Plaintiff and others That the notice was read aloud to Deft (deffendant) the ? "You have ? late wheras the order" he proceeded with the sale that Deft (deffendant) sold certain ? (enumerated) after service of the notice, That about 10 minutes to 2 o'clock the Deft (deffendant) was served with the order That after such service the Deft (deffendant) received money in payment for goods which had been previously sold subsequent to the notice notice delivered several parcels of the goods to the purchasers. After the application for attachment for ? was served on Deft (defendant) dated the 28nd of Sept reciting the order and restraining him from selling or in any way dealing with goods of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed? ? the ? of Plaintiff