Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MTA"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | based upon affidavit of Plaintiff's and then to the ? that their goods had been seized that the seizure was illegal?. | + | based upon affidavit of Plaintiff's and then to the [?] that their goods had been seized that the seizure was illegal [?]. |
And after ? that notice of sale had been given for the 25th and the sale was being proceeded with on the 23rd. | And after ? that notice of sale had been given for the 25th and the sale was being proceeded with on the 23rd. | ||
| − | An order was made by Mr ? Pray restraining the defendant form selling the ? goods seized b him or parting with the proceed of sale. | + | An order was made by Mr [?] Pray restraining the defendant form selling the [?] goods seized b him or parting with the proceed of sale. |
| − | The defendant was served with a notice that such order had been made ? subsequently served with a copy of the order ( see copied ?) | + | The defendant was served with a notice that such order had been made [?] subsequently served with a copy of the order ( see copied [?]) |
The same evening he received a letter informing him that on the following day application had been made to commit him for contempt. | The same evening he received a letter informing him that on the following day application had been made to commit him for contempt. | ||
| − | The affidavit filed in support of the application for ? alleges the service abb 1,30 ? on the day of sale of the notice that the order had been made | + | The affidavit filed in support of the application for [?] alleges the service abb 1,30 [?] on the day of sale of the notice that the order had been made |
Latest revision as of 06:54, 6 May 2024
based upon affidavit of Plaintiff's and then to the [?] that their goods had been seized that the seizure was illegal [?].
And after ? that notice of sale had been given for the 25th and the sale was being proceeded with on the 23rd.
An order was made by Mr [?] Pray restraining the defendant form selling the [?] goods seized b him or parting with the proceed of sale.
The defendant was served with a notice that such order had been made [?] subsequently served with a copy of the order ( see copied [?])
The same evening he received a letter informing him that on the following day application had been made to commit him for contempt.
The affidavit filed in support of the application for [?] alleges the service abb 1,30 [?] on the day of sale of the notice that the order had been made
