Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MDk"
From transcribe
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | persons where goods were | + | persons where goods were seized were notified that the sale ? take place on the 25 ? the contrary the 25 but on the contrary the Deff (defendant) ported a ? 18 notice in ? placed in the ? |
− | that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these | + | that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these notices being ported up on the on the same street within a few yards of the? of both Plaintiff & the said ? Chong |
− | The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by | + | |
− | On the 23rd Sept the | + | The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by Deff (defendant) on the 19th Sept served Deff with a ? ? (? 15 the ? 1954) with notice that on ? had he applied for 15 ? [deft?] from selling |
− | The Plaintiff | + | |
+ | On the 23rd Sept the day of sale the Plaintiff earned and applied for an ? | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Plaintiff's application was |
Revision as of 02:32, 6 May 2024
persons where goods were seized were notified that the sale ? take place on the 25 ? the contrary the 25 but on the contrary the Deff (defendant) ported a ? 18 notice in ? placed in the ? that the sale ? he on the 28nd some of these notices being ported up on the on the same street within a few yards of the? of both Plaintiff & the said ? Chong
The Plaintiff soon after the seizure by Deff (defendant) on the 19th Sept served Deff with a ? ? (? 15 the ? 1954) with notice that on ? had he applied for 15 ? [deft?] from selling
On the 23rd Sept the day of sale the Plaintiff earned and applied for an ?
The Plaintiff's application was