.MTQ1.MTY1MTA
From transcribe
Revision as of 01:36, 6 May 2024 by 172.20.1.1 (Talk)
based upon ? of Plaintiff's and then to the ? that their goods had been seized that the seizure was illegal?.
And after ? that notice of sale had been given for the 25th and the sale was being proceeded with on the 23rd.
An order was made by Mr ? Pray restraining the defendant form selling the ? goods seized b him or parting with the proceed of sale.
The defendant was served with a notice that such order had been made ? subsequently served with a copy of the order ( see copied ?)
The same evening he received a letter informing him that on the following day application had been made to commit him for contempt.
The ? filed in ? of the application for ? ? the service abb 1,30 ? on the day of sale of the notice that the order had been made
