Editing .MTQ1.MTY1MTk
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed | of Plaintiff or parting with the proceed | ||
and commanding the payment of Plaintiff | and commanding the payment of Plaintiff | ||
− | + | ? of preparing issuing serving the | |
− | + | ? | |
Maguire affidavit The Defendant alleges that after the | Maguire affidavit The Defendant alleges that after the | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
distrained that his (name Chong) goods | distrained that his (name Chong) goods | ||
would be sold on the 25 September but | would be sold on the 25 September but | ||
− | subsequently as (certaining?) from the | + | subsequently as (certaining?) from the ? |
− | that 5 days was the time | + | that 5 days was the time ? for notice |
− | of sale under distress warrant he | + | of sale under distress warrant he ? |
− | to the party so notified | + | to the party so notified ? ? that he |
had made a mistake and that the sale | had made a mistake and that the sale | ||
would take place on the 23rd instead of | would take place on the 23rd instead of | ||
the 25th and asked for return of the | the 25th and asked for return of the | ||
− | notice | + | notice ? given and he was told if |
− | could not be | + | could not be ? |
With this exception nether the | With this exception nether the | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
That he had no notice or intimation of any | That he had no notice or intimation of any | ||
− | kind that an | + | kind that an ?would be applied for |
The Plaintiff observations and others have tried to | The Plaintiff observations and others have tried to | ||
establish that the Defendant from the | establish that the Defendant from the | ||
− | beginning of the | + | beginning of the ? |
the sale took the law into his own | the sale took the law into his own | ||
hands. That he mislead the parties | hands. That he mislead the parties | ||
whose goods were seized by giving them | whose goods were seized by giving them | ||
− | a notice | + | a notice ? to throw them off |