Difference between revisions of ".MTQ1.MTY1MjE"
(Created page with "under those ?otherwise if a tax collector were ? in consequential a similar endorsement on the writ to wait till the party suing him applied his infirmetion? the collection of...") |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
? is a ? order | ? is a ? order | ||
? notice of such an order will | ? notice of such an order will | ||
| − | ? suffice that the order | + | ? suffice the affidavit ? |
| + | sider? show that the order was demanded | ||
| + | |||
| + | But suppose such a notice was sufficient | ||
| + | service of the order there is nothing | ||
| + | on the affidavit filed for the Plaintiff | ||
| + | to show that after the service of the | ||
| + | notice any of the Plaintiff's goods were | ||
| + | sold or the proceed thereof parted | ||
| + | with | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nor that the defendant either after | ||
| + | serving the notice or being served | ||
| + | with the order willfully or ? | ||
Revision as of 04:44, 6 May 2024
under those ?otherwise if a tax collector were ? in consequential a similar endorsement on the writ to wait till the party suing him applied his infirmetion? the collection of any
tax no matter how legal or constitutional
might he delayed for ? e.q. if the seizure were made and the writ were issued in the ?
If does not at all follow from the fear of a writ being indorsed with notice Infirmetion? will be applied for
The claim for the Infirmetion? indorsed on
the writ is merely a preliminary for mality
if ? he pleaded to yeven? supposing ? by defendant for the writ if ? he inferred? exception by applying to the Court by ? on affidavit ? could he stated shy the writ should not ?
The order ? the ? made the ? is a ? order ? notice of such an order will ? suffice the affidavit ?
sider? show that the order was demanded
But suppose such a notice was sufficient service of the order there is nothing on the affidavit filed for the Plaintiff to show that after the service of the notice any of the Plaintiff's goods were sold or the proceed thereof parted with
Nor that the defendant either after serving the notice or being served with the order willfully or ?
